Sex Ed gets revamped

By now, you have probably heard about how Ontario is revising its sex education curriculum. Starting this fall, age groups as young as Grade 3 will be taught about the birds and the bees — in age-appropriate ways, we’re told. For older age groups, more explicit topics (such as masturbation, anal intercourse and vaginal lubrication <- I got this from an article) will be covered.

Naturally, “family-focused” groups (read: the Christian Right) are outraged, particularly about lessons regarding sexual orientation and gender identity.

Premier Dalton McGuinty defends the revision, saying it’s either teachers, the internet or schoolyard informants.

I think I’m with McGuinty on this one. While I can’t imagine my step-daughter (Grade 1 now) learning about this stuff in less than two years, I would rather her learn about sex from an educator and not a schoolmate… like I did (thank you to Ben, wherever you are). I also think incorporating education on homosexuality has potential to reduce homophobia and subsequent bullying.

For those who are against it, I can see their fear of encouraging youth in the direction of promiscuity. Unfortunately, there is no evidence saying that stifling sex education (or in some regions, abstinence-only education) reduces the likelihood of sexual activity in young teenagers. In cases where information is held back, youth tend to turn to other misleading sources to learn what they want to know (i.e. porn). We also see that the more information people have, the more informed decisions they make — which could very well mean waiting to have sex.

While I understand the hesitancy, I think we need to embrace the fact kids are smarter than we think. They will learn about sex one way or the other, so why not take matters into our own hands and make sure they are getting proper information?

What do you guys think?


5 thoughts on “Sex Ed gets revamped

  1. I agree as well. It would have saved me a lot of embarrassment as a kid when I confused an anatomical part with the name of the Capital of Saskatchewan.

    • The problem with relying on parents is not all parents a) feel comfortable talking about it, b) are properly informed themselves, particularly on topics such as contraception methods, STDs, etc.

      The other argument is that standardised education about homosexuality will reduce problems of bullying and homophobia.

  2. my parents were liberal and made sure we got the sex talk. they told us what we learned in school: how babies are made and how to prevent babies and std’s. oh and, if we want to be absolutely sure we could rely on abstinence. i was ripped off. big time. nobody ever sat me down and told me about what promiscuity is, or the potential social consequences (other than pregnancy and disease). nobody told me how boys will tell you anything they can to get you into bed and how thoroughly they despise you for it when you fall for their tricks. anybody can find out the mechanics of how sex works but if we really want to prepare our kids, and hope that they wait for the right time, we need to give them practical information, practical advice, and provide them with other ways to find a sense of self-worth (which is, in my opinion, the leading cause of teenage promiscuity). telling them “just say no” isn’t very helpful at all and sadly too many parents can’t get over their own discomfort when discussing sex with their kids.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s