Information you need before we begin:
1) The new girl at work is brown.
2) There are a lot of both Indians and Indian-Canadians in my office.
3) I am English-Canadian
–
*Coworkers huddle outside, waiting for the fire drill to end*
Coworker 1: Are we ordering Indian food today?
Coworker 2: I don’t think so.
Coworker 1: I have a real craving for it.
Me: I could go for some Korma.
New girl: Really? I don’t like Indian food.
Me: Oh that’s okay, I don’t like English food.
New girl: I’m not Indian.
Me: Right.
-end-
I apologised and learned that her family was from Trinidad. We moved on to talk about other things, but I was mortified for the rest of the day, and if I think about it now (which I am), I shake my head. I assumed she was Indian because she is brown, which was an ignorant assumption.
Here’s where it gets confusing in my head. Coworker 1 later told me it’s not a big deal, that where someone is from shouldn’t be a sensetive topic (after all, there is nothing wrong with being from India). So now I’m wondering if she’s right. *Should* this be a sensetive topic and am I making something out of nothing?
It’s interesting because I think we make these sort of race-based assumptions all the time; I would argue, a lot of the time, it’s innocent. For example, I’m white and people are often surprised to find out I’m first generation Canadian; whereas, I have fifth-gen Asian-Canadian friends and strangers assume they just got here.
I still feel dumb and have learned my lesson, but I wanted to put it out there and see what you guys think of this topic.
November 10, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Well unless I’m mistaken and you’re actually from England I don’t see how there is an issue here. Based on your recount of the event it sounds like one person not from India said they don’t like Indian food and one person not from England doesn’t like English food. And if you need any reassurance about race issues I would refer you to Russell Peters and his amazing insights on the issue.